top of page

Moral Judgment and Legal Responsibility

Me with (Smart) Objects

9-11 years

25 min

Learning goal :

Learning to differentiate a human being from an "intelligent" machine

Pedagogical Intention : 

Identify moral differences

Target skills : 

Understanding that only a human person can be morally responsible.

Materials : 

Simplified legal case study

Detailed Procedure :

1. Presentation of a simplified real case (self-driving car). 2. Analysis of intention, decision, and consequences. 3. Identify who can be held morally accountable. 4. Structured group debate. 5. Individual argued writing. 6. Conclusion: only a human person can be held morally accountable.

Progress Indicators

The student argues in writing why a robot cannot be held morally accountable.

Research Foundations

Floridi; AI ethics.

9_COLLOQUE_NEUROSCIENCES_AUDITORIUM_J2_Photo-Regine-Lemarchand-_22_10_24-18_edited.jpg

Ready to lead your school through the AI transition?

Let’s explore together how EdHu2O5O can support your journey with tailored tools, training, and strategic guidance.

Contact Us

Have a question, want to collaborate, or explore how we can support your school, institution, or government in navigating the age of AI?

Simply fill out the form below, a member of our team will get back to you shortly.

Donate

EdHu2O5O is a registered charity in Canada - Registration Number 752850602RR0001 - authorized to receive donations in support of its educational and research initiatives. As a recognized charitable organization, EdHu2O5O issues official tax receipts for all eligible donations.

This status allows philanthropists and partners to meaningfully contribute to advancing our mission while benefiting from tax deductions as provided under Canadian law.

ADDRESS

EMAIL

Montréal, Canada

© 2025 by EdHu2O5O. All rights reserved

bottom of page